�Improving and Maximizing the Financial
Performance of MSMEs:� A Case Study on MSMEs
in the Bangka Belitung Islands Province
Christine1*,
Nizwan Zukhri2, Darman Saputra3
1,2,3University
of Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
Email:
[email protected]
Abstract |
In times of financial crisis, MSMEs remain an important
economic tool that influence Indonesia's economic growth. MSMEs have the power
to raise people's standard of living, particularly in terms of money. The
purpose of this study is to investigate how the financial performance of
MSMEs in the Bangka Belitung Islands Province is impacted by credit giving,
financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital characteristics. This
study uses an associative methodology and is quantitative in nature.
Purposive sampling procedures were used to obtain 102 MSME actors for the
sample. SPSS software version 26 is used to assist with the data analysis
technique. The study's findings
demonstrate that financial inclusion (X2), fintech (X5), intellectual capital
(X6), and partial credit giving (X1) all significantly and favorably impact MSMEs' financial performance. The Bangka
Belitung Islands' MSMEs' financial performance is positively and
significantly impacted by the concurrent factors of credit granting,
financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital. The independent
variable accounts for 88.5% of the variation in the dependent variable, with
the remaining 11.5% being impacted by factors not examined in this study,
according to the R Square value of 0.885 in this investigation. |
Keywords: |
Credit
Granting, Financial Inclusion, Fintech, Intellectual Capital, Financial
Performance, MSME |
INTRODUCTION
In many nations, including Indonesia,
micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) are essential economic
instruments. The expansion and improvement of MSMEs affect the economic growth
of Indonesia's different regions. Up to 2023, the number of MSMEs in the Bangka
Belitung Islands Province increased significantly; they eventually reached
The fourth quarter of 2022 saw an overall
4.44 percent year-over-year growth in Bangka Belitung's economy, bolstered by
improved MSMEs' performance. MSMEs in Bangka Belitung have grown and developed
due to their actors' struggles to compete and survive, particularly during the
COVID-19 pandemic. For MSMEs to generate strong financial performance, they
must be handled by trustworthy human resources to support finances
MSME actors must have a thorough understanding of both what constitutes and how to attain sound financial performance. Numerous elements have been demonstrated to have an impact on MSMEs' financial performance across various Indonesian areas. Prior studies looked at a number of variables in different areas; Bangka Belitung's MSMEs have not been the subject of any research.
There exist multiple factors that have
been demonstrated to positively impact the financial performance of micro,
small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in different regions of Indonesia.
These factors include credit granting, financial inclusion, fintech, and
intellectual capital
The degree of financial inclusion in
Indonesia has steadily increased between 2013 and 2022
With the biggest estimated value of
fintech transactions from 2016 to 2022, Indonesia is the nation that has shown
the most constant positive growth, with an average annual growth of 15.5
percent for fintech transactions from 2018 to 2022. Fintech goods and services
are a crucial component of MSME players' financial management strategies
Apart from these variables, intellectual
capital is the primary determinant of MSMEs' performance
In order to generate findings and offer a clear understanding of the improvement of MSME financial performance through the factors tested, the researcher, therefore, carried out additional research to examine the influence of factors that are proven to affect the improvement of MSME financial performance, such as credit granting, financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital, on the financial performance of MSMEs in the Bangka Belitung Islands Province. This study aims to better understand the effects of credit granting, financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital on MSMEs' financial performance, with a particular focus on MSMEs in the province of Bangka Belitung Islands.
It is hoped that the outcomes will
encourage other MSMEs in Bangka Belitung to consider ways to enhance their
financial performance in order to achieve strong financial performance and so
be able to advance and grow. In particular, the research focused on MSMEs in
the Bangka Belitung Islands Province area and aimed to advance knowledge in the
field of MSME financial performance by offering a clearer understanding of how
to improve MSMEs' financial performance through credit granting, financial
inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital.
RESEARCH METHODS
This study
combines an associative strategy with a quantitative approach. The primary goal
of this research is to determine the influence or relationship between several
independent variables, namely Credit Granting (X1), Financial Inclusion (X2),
Fintech (X3), and Intellectual Capital (X4), and the dependent variable, namely
financial performance (Y) in MSMEs in Bangka Belitung Islands Province. The
study was conducted on MSMEs in the province, with data gathered from the
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Cooperative Office and the Integrated
Business Service Center (PLUT) of Bangka Belitung
Islands Province. Data gathering runs from January to March 2024.
This study
focuses on MSMEs in the Bangka Belitung Islands Province, with participants
including officials from the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Cooperative
Office and PLUT. The research population includes all MSMEs in the Bangka
Belitung Islands Province, and the research sample consists of 102 MSME units
chosen using certain criteria. The example requirements include MSMEs that are
based in the province, are supported by PLUT Bangka Belitung, and are legally
operating.
The
nonprobability sampling method was combined with the purposive sampling
methodology. This technique selects respondents using predetermined criteria.
Primary data were gathered through the distribution of questionnaires,
interviews, and observation. The data gathering procedure is divided into three
stages: sending questionnaires to MSME actors, conducting interviews to get
further information, and directly seeing data gathered through interviews,
questionnaires, and data at the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises
Cooperative Office and PLUT.
With the use of
SPSS 26 software and quantitative analysis, data analysis was completed.
Descriptive statistical analysis, validity tests, reliability tests,
heteroscedasticity tests, multicollinearity tests, partial tests (t),
simultaneous tests (f), and determination coefficient tests (R2) are among the
processes in the analytical process. The objective of this study method is to
verify the research hypothesis and get a reliable conclusion about the impact
of independent variables on MSMEs' financial performance in the province of
Bangka Belitung Islands.
Results and Discussion
Results of Descriptive Statistical
Analysis
Table 1. Results of Descriptive
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive Statistics |
||||||
|
N |
Min |
Max |
Sum |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Credit Granting |
102 |
6 |
30 |
2693 |
26.40 |
3.872 |
Financial Inclusion |
102 |
6 |
30 |
2636 |
25.84 |
3.914 |
Fintech |
102 |
7 |
30 |
2742 |
26.88 |
3.654 |
Intellectual Capital |
102 |
7 |
30 |
2750 |
26.96 |
3.726 |
Financial Performance |
102 |
7 |
30 |
2709 |
26.56 |
3.845 |
Valid N (listwise) |
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
The aforementioned table indicates that
102 data points, or N, were used in this study. It also describes each variable
in the study, and it is clear that each variable's mean value exceeds its
standard deviation value. Consequently, it can be said that the variables that
deal with credit granting, financial inclusion, fintech, intellectual capital,
and financial performance have low data deviation and flat value deviation.
Validity and Reliability Test Results
Table
2. Validity and Reliability Test Results
Variable |
Statement |
R
Calculate |
R
Table |
Result |
Cronbach
Alpha |
Result |
Credit
Granting |
X1.1 |
0,820 |
0,164 |
Valid |
0,960 |
Reliable |
X1.2 |
0,858 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X1.3 |
0,812 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X1.4 |
0,837 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X1.5 |
0,777 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X1.6 |
0,817 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Financial
Inclusion |
X2.1 |
0,802 |
0,164 |
Valid |
0,963 |
Reliable |
X2.2 |
0,792 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X2.3 |
0,818 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X2.4 |
0,849 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X2.5 |
0,858 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X2.6 |
0,765 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Fintech |
X3.1 |
0,798 |
0,164 |
Valid |
0,962 |
Reliable |
X3.2 |
0,840 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X3.3 |
0,814 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X3.4 |
0,814 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X3.5 |
0,824 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X3.6 |
0,812 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Intellectual
Capital |
X4.1 |
0,825 |
0,164 |
Valid |
0,958 |
Reliable |
X4.2 |
0,859 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X4.3 |
0,822 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X4.4 |
0,788 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X4.5 |
0,835 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
X4.6 |
0,828 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Financial
Performance |
Y.1 |
0,820 |
0,164 |
Valid |
0,953 |
Reliable |
Y.2 |
0,832 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Y.3 |
0,819 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Y.4 |
0,819 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Y.5 |
0,818 |
0,164 |
Valid |
|||
Y.6 |
0,806 |
0,164 |
Valid |
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
If the r value is computed > r table,
the validity test is considered successful. By using the formula df = N-2, the R table is produced. If df
represents the number of respondents, then df = 100
or 102 - 2. The r table was then generated using a one-sided test with a
significance level of 0.05 or 5%, yielding a value of 0.164. All assertions
from the variables X1, X2, X3, X4, and Y are deemed to have passed the validity
test based on the test results in the table, as all r values are computed to be
greater than the r values in the table.
If the Cronbach's Alpha value is greater
than 0.6, the reliability test is deemed acceptable or passed (Sugiyono, 2019). A value of greater than 0.90 indicates
flawless reliability. Table 3 shows that all variables were deemed to have
passed the reliability test and to be trustworthy because each variable's
Cronbach's Alpha value was greater than 0.6, indicating that the reliability
was approved with a category designating flawless reliability for all
variables.
Normality Test Results
Table 3. Results of the
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Method Normality Test
Source:
Research Results, Data processed by SPSS, 2024 |
If the significance in the normality test
is greater than 0.05, then the data is normally distributed. The significance
value of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is 0.108, as can be seen from the table.
This indicates that the data on the effects of credit granting, financial
inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital on financial performance are
normally distributed, as indicated by the significance value of 0.108 >
0.05. Consequently, it may be said that this study's residual regression model
has a normal distribution.
Multicollinearity Test Results
Table 4. Multicollinearity Test
Results
Variable |
Tolerance |
BRIGHT |
Conclusion |
Credit Granting |
0,190 |
5,255 |
Non-multicollinearity |
Financial Inclusion |
0,229 |
4,358 |
Non-multicollinearity |
Fintech |
0,186 |
5,384 |
Non-multicollinearity |
Intellectual Capital |
0,154 |
6,506 |
Non-multicollinearity |
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
If the tolerance value was greater than
0.1 and the VIF value was less than 10, the multicollinearity test was deemed
successful, indicating that either the regression model in this investigation
was free of multicollinearity or there was none at all. The table demonstrates
that all independent variable tolerance values are larger than 0.10 and all
variable VIF values are fewer than 10. Therefore, since every independent
variable in this study has a tolerance value of > 0.1 and a VIF < out of
10, it can be said that there is no multicollinearity between any of the
independent variables. The researcher came to the conclusion that the
regression model's non-multicollinearity assumption had been satisfied.
Heteroscedasticity Test Results (Glejser)
Table 5. Results of the Heteroscedasticity Test (Gglejser Test)
Variable |
Significance |
Credit Granting |
0,919 |
Financial Inclusion |
0,175 |
Fintech |
0,714 |
Intellectual Capital |
0,085 |
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
Using the Gleejser
Test, this study examined the heteroscedasticity test. If the significance >
0.05, then there are no heteroscedasticity symptoms in the regression model,
which is the premise for making decisions on the heteroscedasticity test
utilizing the Glejser Test. Since all of the
variables' significance values are greater than 0.05, it is possible to
conclude that the regression model does not have a heteroscedasticity issue and
can be used.
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis
Test Results
Table 6. Multiple Linear
Regression Analysis Test Results
Variable |
Unstandardized
Coefficients (B) |
Significance |
(Constant) |
-0.401 |
0,684 |
Credit Granting |
0,256 |
0,001 |
Financial Inclusion |
0,298 |
0,000 |
Fintech |
0,217 |
0,009 |
Intellectual Capital |
0,246 |
0,006 |
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
The multiple linear regression equation
can be determined as follows using the test results shown in the table:
Y
= -0,401 + 0,256X1 + 0,298X2 + 0,217X3 + 0,246X4
The results of the
multiple linear regression equation provide the understanding that:
1.
According to the constant of -0.401, financial
performance (Y) falls if credit giving (X1), financial inclusion (X2), fintech
(X3), and intellectual capital (X4) all have values equal to 0 (zero).
2.
The credit granting variable (X1)'s regression
coefficient of 0.256 indicates that, if other independent variables stay
stable, the value of financial performance (Y) will increase by 0.256 for every
1% increase in the credit granting variable (X1).
3.
The financial performance (Y) value improves by
0.298 if the financial inclusion variable (X2) increases by 1%, provided that
all other independent variables stay constant. This is explained by the
regression coefficient of X2), which is 0.298.
4.
The fintech variable (X3)'s regression
coefficient of 0.217 indicates that, assuming that other independent variables
stay constant, an increase of 1% in the fintech variable (X3) will result in an
increase of 0.217 in the value of financial performance (Y).
5.
The intellectual capital variable (X4)'s
regression coefficient of 0.246 indicates that, provided other independent
variables stay constant, an increase of 1% in the intellectual capital variable
(X4) would result in an increase of 0.246 in the value of financial performance
(Y).
Partial Test Result (t)
Table 7. Partial Test Result (t)
Variable |
T-count
Value |
Significance
Value |
Credit Granting |
3,351 |
0,001 |
Financial Inclusion |
4,333 |
0,000 |
Fintech |
2,649 |
0,009 |
Intellectual Capital |
2,788 |
0,006 |
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
The table suggests that the following are the outcomes of the statistical test conducted in this study to verify the hypothesis:
H1 = The financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung is positively and significantly impacted by credit granting. The credit issuing variable (X1) had a t-count of 3.351 > 1.661 and a significance value of 0.001 < 0.05, according to the t-test computation findings. This indicates that H1 is approved, demonstrating that the financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung is significantly and favorably impacted by the loan-providing variable.
H2
= The financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung is positively and
significantly impacted by financial inclusion. The financial inclusion variable
(X2) had a t-count of 4.333 > t-table 1.661 and a significance value of
0.000 < 0.05, according to the t-test computation findings. Thus, H2 is
deemed to be valid, demonstrating that the financial inclusion variable
significantly and favorably affects the financial
performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung.
H3
= The financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung is significantly and favorably impacted by fintech. The fintech variable (X3)
had a t-count of 2.649 > t-table 1.661 and a significance value of 0.009
< 0.05, according to the t-test computation findings. As a result, H3 is
deemed to be valid, demonstrating that fintech factors significantly and favorably impact MSMEs' financial performance in Bangka
Belitung.
H4:
In Bangka Belitung, intellectual capital significantly and favorably
affects MSMEs' financial performance. The computation for the intellectual
capital variable (X4) was 2.788 > 1.661 and had a significance value of
0.006 < 0.05, according to the t-test findings. Thus, H4 is deemed to be
valid, demonstrating that the financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung
is positively and significantly impacted by the intellectual capital variable.
Simultaneous Test Results (f)
Table 8. Simultaneous Test Results
(f)
F
Test |
||||||
Model |
Sum
of Squares |
Df |
Mean
Square |
F |
Say. |
|
1 |
Regression |
1329.778 |
4 |
332.445 |
197.388 |
.000b |
Residual |
163.369 |
97 |
1.684 |
|
|
|
Total |
1493.147 |
101 |
|
|
|
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
A 5% significance threshold was applied
when comparing the values of Fcal and Ftabel in the simultaneous test. The independent variable
has a substantial partial impact on the dependent variable if the profitability
is less than 0.05. With a significance level of 0.05, get the Ftable, df1 = k � 1 = 5 � 1 = 4 and df2 = n � k = 102 � 5 =
97. Thus, 2,465 is the value of the Ftable. The
hypothesis is considered accepted if Fcal >
F-table and the independent variable's influence on the dependent variable is
indicated if the significance threshold is less than 0.05. The following
hypothesis was tested using the F test:
H5 = Credit giving, financial inclusion,
fintech, and intellectual capital all have a favorable
and noteworthy impact on MSMEs' financial performance in Bangka Belitung at the
same time.
The table shows that the significant value
is 0.000 < the significance level is 0.05, and the value of Fcal is 197.388 > Ftable is
2.465. Given that H5 was approved, it can be said that credit allocation,
financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital all have a substantial
and favorable impact on MSMEs' financial performance
in Bangka Belitung.
Results of the Determination
Coefficient Test (R2).
Table 9. Results of the
Determination Coefficient Test (R2).
Coefficient
Determination |
|||||
Model
R |
R
Square |
Adjusted
R Square |
Std.
Error of the Estimate |
Y
Deviation Standard |
|
1 |
.944a |
.891 |
.886 |
1.298 |
3.845 |
Source: Research Results, Data
processed by SPSS, 2024
A closer R2 score to 1 indicates a larger
effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable in the
determination coefficient test. Table 10 shows that the Adjusted R Square
(Adjusted R2) has a value of 0.886, or 88.6%. Thus, the financial performance
of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung may be impacted by credit giving, financial
inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital all at the same time by 88.6%,
with the remaining 11.4% being influenced by factors not included in this
study. Additionally, it can be observed that the independent variable's
standard deviation value, Y, is 3.845 > the Standard Error of the Estimate
(3.845 > 1.298), indicating that the regression capital is more accurate in
predicting financial performance variables. The Standard Error of the Estimate
(SEE) is 1.298.
Discussion
The study's findings demonstrate the concurrent positive and substantial effects of credit giving, financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital on the financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung. This implies that the financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung will rise in tandem with the growth of loan giving, financial inclusion, fintech, and intellectual capital.
A portion of the credit granting variable
used by MSMEs has a positive and significant impact on MSMEs' financial
performance in Bangka Belitung. This means that MSMEs can enhance their
business financial performance through indicators of trust, speed, and credit
realization by utilizing the credit grants that banks and other financial
institutions offer. This will facilitate easy access to credit, which will
encourage MSMEs to grow and perform better. Ayem
et al.
The financial inclusion variable used by
MSMEs has a positive and significant impact on MSMEs' financial performance in
Bangka Belitung. This means that as financial inclusion rises, MSMEs' financial
performance will rise as well through indicators of access, availability,
quality, and welfare. These indicators can help MSME actors overcome financial
pressure on their businesses and have an impact on MSMEs' business income
through financial institution services that improve their business welfare. The
outcomes of this study are corroborated by Darmawan et al.
A small percentage of MSMEs' financial
performance in Bangka Belitung is positively and significantly impacted by the
fintech variables that they use. This means that when MSME actors apply
fintech, their business's financial performance can be enhanced through
practical, user-friendly, and safe indicators that can help them manage their
finances more effectively and efficiently. Fintech facilitates easy and quick
transactions, which makes managing finances more flexible and successful. Chao
et al.
The financial performance of MSMEs in
Bangka Belitung is positively and significantly impacted by the intellectual
capital variable owned by MSME actors. This means that the higher the level of
intellectual capital owned, the better the financial performance produced
through indicators of human, structural, and customer capital. These indicators
can increase productivity by leveraging MSME actors' knowledge and ability to
create financial value, which will have a better impact on future financial
performance. The study's findings are corroborated by Akuba et al.
CONCLUSION
The research and discussion in
this study have led to the conclusion that credit giving, financial inclusion,
fintech, and intellectual capital all positively and significantly impact
MSMEs' financial performance in Bangka Belitung, partly and concurrently. This
implies that the financial performance of MSMEs in Bangka Belitung will rise in
tandem with the growth of loan giving, financial inclusion, fintech, and
intellectual capital. Only 88.6% of the dependent variables in this study were
explained by the independent variable, according to the Adjusted R square
result of 88.6%. It is hoped that research will be done in the future in order
to be able to add more variables that could affect financial performance, like
moderating/intervening variables like MSME training and the ability to conduct
research using other analytical techniques like qualitative research or other
analytical tools like SmartPLS.In order to further
characterize the particulars of each category or kind of MSMEs, they may also
undertake research on MSMEs depending on each category or type of MSMEs, such
as micro, small, and medium-sized companies. In order to generate good and
maximum financial performance, MSME actors are also expected to expand their
usage and application of loan giving, financial inclusion, fintech, and
intellectual capital. This will enable them to sustain their businesses and
meet their financial objectives.
REFERENCES
Absah, Y., Muchtar, Y. C., & Qamariah, I. (2018). The effect of intellectual capital on
business performance in micro-, small-, and medium enterprise (MSME) in Medan
City. KnE Social Sciences.
Afrianti, M. N., & Biduri, S. (2023). Demographic Factors, Financial
Technology, and Financial Self Efficacy on MSME Financial Performance: Faktor Demografi, Financial Technology, dan Financial Self
Efficacy Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan
UMKM.
Akuba, A., & Hasmirati, H. (2021). Pengaruh
Intellectual Capital Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Usaha Kecil Menengah
Di Kecamatan Tilamuta Kabupaten Boalemo. Procuratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 9(1),
66�74.
Alhammadi, S. (2023). Expanding
financial inclusion in Indonesia through Takaful: opportunities, challenges
and sustainability. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
Ayem, S., & Wahidah, U.
(2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan UMKM Di
Kota Yogyakarta. JEMMA
(Journal of Economic, Management and Accounting), 4(1), 1�9.
Chao, J., & Tao, Z.
(2023). A Study on the Impact of Financial Technology on Medium, Small and
Micro Enterprises in China. Modern Economy, 14(5), 582�600.
Darmawan, A., Sepriani, A., Bagis, F., &
Rahmawati, D. V. (2021). Pengaruh Faktor Demografi, Locus 0f
Control, Literasi Keuangan, dan Inklusi Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan
UMKM. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2), 170�180.
Fomum, T. A., & Opperman, P. (2023). Financial inclusion and performance of MSMEs in Eswatini. International
Journal of Social Economics, ahead-of-print.
Gupta, U., Agarwal, B.,
& Nautiyal, N. (2022). Financial Technology Adoption�A Case of Indian
MSMEs. Финансы:
Теория и Практика,
26(6), 192�211.
Junarsin, E., Pelawi,
R. Y., Kristanto, J., Marcelin, I., & Pelawi, J. B. (2023). Does fintech lending expansion
disturb financial system stability? Evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(9).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18384
Maksum, I. R., Sri Rahayu, A. Y.,
& Kusumawardhani, D. (2020). A social enterprise
approach to empowering micro, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in
Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity,
6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6030050
Nopiyani, P. E., & Indiani, P. R. (2023). Pengaruh Sikap Keuangan,
Perilaku Keuangan Dan Literasi Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Umkm Pada
Pemdes Ambengan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kompetif, 6(3), 411�418.
Octaviani, R., & Putri, R. F. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang
Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) di Kota
Medan. Regress:
Journal of Economics & Management, 1(1), 24�29.
Peng, H., Ji, J., Sun, H.,
& Xu, H. (2023). Legal enforcement and fintech credit: International
evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 72, 214�231.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.03.007
Pham, C. Van, Liu, S. F.,
& Chen, S. H. (2024). Corporate ESG performance and intellectual capital:
International evidence. Asia Pacific Management Review.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.12.003
Sampurnawati, S., & Agustina, T.
(2021). The Influence of HR Competence and Intellectual Capital on the
Performance of MSMEs in Sasirangan Craftsmen. Quantitative
Economics and Management Studies, 2(5), 326�334.
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems277
Sardo, F., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Alves, H. (2018). On the
relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance: A panel
data analysis on SME hotels. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 75, 67�74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.03.001
Sinaga, S. T., Ekananda, M., Gitaharie, B. Y., & Setyowati, M. (2023).
Tax Buoyancy in
Indonesia: An Evaluation of Tax Structure and Policy Reforms. Economies,
11(12), 294.
Srimulyani, V. A., Hermanto, Y. B., Rustiyaningsih, S., & Setiyo
Waloyo, L. A. (2023). Internal factors of
entrepreneurial and business performance of small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) in East Java, Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(11).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21637
Wang, X., Sadiq, R., Khan,
T. M., & Wang, R. (2021). Industry 4.0 and intellectual capital in the age
of FinTech. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166,
120598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120598
Copyright holder: Christine, Nizwan Zukhri, Darman Saputra (2024) |
First publication right: |
This article is licensed under: |